Abstract

The purpose of the article is to define the aesthetic phenomenon of the anthropological border in the context of the synthesis of arts. The research methodology is presented using comparative and systemic approaches. Among the philosophical methods, the transcendental method (identification of the other as an a priori aesthetic act), the phenomenological method (definition of the dispositive of the aesthetic act as empathy, dialogue), the dialectical method (definition of the dialectic of the exchange of places in being, according to M. Bakhtin, as prerequisites for the transgression of estesis), which provide an opportunity to carry out a philosophical and anthropological analysis of the synthesis of arts as a dynamic integrity in the context of possible, existing and post-existing modes of existence of an artistic work. Conclusions. The apex of the evolution of the scene from its ontological understanding as a subject-spatial context of action to an event that marks the beginning and end of the action, and the event itself as temporality becomes the carrier of the modern image of being, is an interactive scene where the presence of the other is eliminated. Postmodern naturalism, against which Vs. Meyerhold, P. Brook and others.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call