Abstract

ConspectusIn recent years, a steadily growing number of chemists, from both academia and industry, have dedicated their research to the development of continuous flow processes performed in milli- or microreactors. The common availability of continuous flow equipment at virtually all scales and affordable cost has additionally impacted this trend. Furthermore, regulatory agencies such as the United States Food and Drug Administration actively encourage continuous manufacturing of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with the vision of quality and productivity improvements. That is why the pharmaceutical industry is progressively implementing continuous flow technologies. As a result of the exceptional characteristics of continuous flow reactors such as small reactor volumes and remarkably fast heat and mass transfer, process conditions which need to be avoided in conventional batch syntheses can be safely employed. Thus, continuous operation is particularly advantageous for reactions at high temperatures/pressures (novel process windows) and for ultrafast, exothermic reactions (flash chemistry).In addition to conditions that are outside of the operation range of conventional stirred tank reactors, reagents possessing a high hazard potential and therefore not amenable to batch processing can be safely utilized (forbidden chemistry). Because of the small reactor volumes, risks in case of a failure are minimized. Such hazardous reagents often are low molecular weight compounds, leading generally to the most atom-, time-, and cost-efficient route toward the desired product. Ideally, they are generated from benign, readily available and cheap precursors within the closed environment of the flow reactor on-site on-demand. By doing so, the transport, storage, and handling of those compounds, which impose a certain safety risk especially on a large scale, are circumvented. This strategy also positively impacts the global supply chain dependency, which can be a severe issue, particularly in times of stricter safety regulations or an epidemic. The concept of the in situ production of a hazardous material is generally referred to as the “generator” of the material. Importantly, in an integrated flow process, multiple modules can be assembled consecutively, allowing not only an in-line purification/separation and quenching of the reagent, but also its downstream conversion to a nonhazardous product.For the past decade, research in our group has focused on the continuous generation of hazardous reagents using a range of reactor designs and experimental techniques, particularly toward the synthesis of APIs. In this Account, we therefore introduce chemical generator concepts that have been developed in our laboratories for the production of toxic, explosive, and short-lived reagents. We have defined three different classes of generators depending on the reactivity/stability of the reagents, featuring reagents such as Br2, HCN, peracids, diazomethane (CH2N2), or hydrazoic acid (HN3). The various reactor designs, including in-line membrane separation techniques and real-time process analytical technologies for the generation, purification, and monitoring of those hazardous reagents, and also their downstream transformations are presented. This Account should serve as food for thought to extend the scope of chemical generators for accomplishing more efficient and more economic processes.

Highlights

  • The most direct, atom-economic, and sustainable synthetic routes frequently require the use of highly reactive, often toxic and short-lived reagents

  • A safe continuous process was reported by Jensen and coworkers in 2001 where phosgene was generated from Cl2 and carbon monoxide (CO) under activated carbon catalysis in a siliconbased packed-bed reactor with a productivity of 1−11 g/h

  • In 2016, we reported the safe generation of BrN3 starting from low-cost NaBr and NaN3 using Oxone as the oxidizing agent and its immediate consumption by an olefin in a radical 1,2-bromoazidation reaction (Scheme 13).[45]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The most direct, atom-economic, and sustainable synthetic routes frequently require the use of highly reactive, often toxic and short-lived reagents Despite their advantages, many of such hazardous reagents are banned from laboratories in both industry and academia in a conventional chemical environment, and alternative routes employing easier to handle materials are chosen instead. The high dependency on the global supply chain, changing market situation, and quality of the shipped material has a significant impact on the end-user This vulnerability becomes even more severe nowadays because authorities in low-cost countries increasingly tighten environmental and safety controls on raw material manufacturers.[2] The prospect of keeping the supply chain short is of major interest to the chemical industry. For further hazardous chemistries performed in continuous flow environments, several other review articles are recommended.[4]

CHEMICAL GENERATORS FOR HAZARDOUS REAGENTS
Generators for Reagents with Limited Stability
Generators for Unstable Reagents
FROM STABLE REAGENTS TO TRANSIENT INTERMEDIATES
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
■ REFERENCES
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call