Abstract

ObjectivesMuscle MRI and ultrasound provide complementary techniques for characterizing muscle changes and tracking disease progression in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). In this cohort study, we provide longitudinal data that compares both imaging modalities head-to-head. MethodsFSHD patients were assessed at baseline and after five years. Standardized muscle MRI and ultrasound images of five leg muscles were assessed bilaterally. Fat replacement was quantified using MRI fat-fraction (FF) and ultrasound Heckmatt and echogenicity z-scores (EZ-score). Muscle edema was evaluated using T2-weighted turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) MRI. ResultsTwenty FSHD patients were included. Muscles with normal baseline imaging showed increases in ultrasound EZ-scores (≥1; in 17%) more often than MRI FF increases (≥10%; in 7%) over time. Muscles with only baseline ultrasound abnormalities often showed considerable FF increases (in 22%), and TIRM positivity at follow-up (44%). Muscles with increased FF at baseline showed stable (80%) or increasing FF (20%) over time. EZ-scores of those muscles either increased (23%), decreased (33%) or remained stable (44%). ConclusionsMuscle ultrasound may capture accelerated pathological muscle changes in FSHD in early disease, while muscle MRI appears better-suited to detecting and monitoring pathology in later stages. SignificanceOur results help establish each techniques’ optimal use as imaging biomarker.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call