Abstract
Individuals reach decisions at every moment of their daily lives. They become happy as long as the benefit of these decisions is above their cost. If real life worked under a complete information hypothesis, all the individuals would live happily forever. In this situation, correct decision making becomes a very important subject for the individuals. There are many decision-making methods. There is no general consensus as to which one of them gives the best solution. Instead, it is suggested to conduct sensitivity analysis in the issue of the reliability of the MCDM methods or comparison to another method. In this study, it has been aimed to compare EDAS and COPRAS methods. For this, the results obtained from EDAS method have been compared to COPRAS and EFI methods. All three methods give the same performance results. The found results are statistically significant. This result supports the strong relationship existing among MCDM methods
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
