Abstract

Frequently overlooked in the discussion of whether there is or is not a higher education bubble are community colleges—despite the fact that this sector within public higher education represents 43 percent of first-time freshman and 44 percent of all undergraduates. For the most part, the “bubble” discussion has focused on whether the cost of higher education provided by four-year universities and colleges, both public and private, has grown to such a level that the benefit or life-long economic return to the student is not worth the price tag. Those suggesting the existence of a “cost bubble” maintain that students are being asked to spend a large amount of money through tuition and fees for a product—a bachelor’s degree—that does not have the promised result for a growing percentage of students. They further maintain that the public’s strongly held commitment to the overstated promises of higher education have actually led to an “enrollment bubble” among those seeking the baccalaureate. Since much of higher education is publicly subsidized, the enrollment bubble can lead to wasteful public expenditures, either through direct appropriations or through federal financial aid grants and loans. Community colleges may well represent an alternative that avoids the potential trap of a higher education bubble. Since the early twentieth century, Acad. Quest. (2011) 24:419–428 DOI 10.1007/s12129-011-9255-6

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.