Abstract

This paper explores the atavistic and feudal historical fantasies that structure Isak Dinesen’s 1937 memoir, Out of Africa . It analyses the imagery and symbolic logic of the memoir in conjunction with Dinesen’s letters from Africa in order to examine how Dinesen derives an idiom to speak of Africa that synthesizes the social structures of European feudalism, the discourse of the noble savage and the aesthetics of the sublime. The paper seeks to unpack the conundrum that fashions a modern, emancipated female subjectivity from the anachronistic paradigm of feudalism and within the framework of imperial domination and colonial occupation. The paper explores how Dinesen’s feudal idiom extends the genre of European pastoral to the colonial milieu and places it in the service of a larger search for a discourse of legitimacy. I argue that this is an abiding preoccupation of colonial literature. I analyze in detail the specular logic through which the narrator confronts Africa as a space that alternately panders to or challenges the psycho-political narcissism of the settler. Dinesen’s memoir reveals the myriad operations of the narcissistic structure through which the narrator strives to fill the copula of the question, “What is Africa to you or you to Africa?”

Highlights

  • RESUMEN: El Pigmalión colonial: Dinesen trastocado en Out of Africa.- Este trabajo explora las fantasías históricas de carácter atávico y feudal que vertebran las memorias de Isak Dinesen en Out of Africa (1937)

  • “Out of Africa is one of the most dangerous books ever written about Africa”

  • When we contemplate that mercurial phenomenon called modernity, attention is often drawn to the narrower band of cultural production roughly bracketed by two world wars: Modernism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

RESUMEN: El Pigmalión colonial: Dinesen trastocado en Out of Africa.- Este trabajo explora las fantasías históricas de carácter atávico y feudal que vertebran las memorias de Isak Dinesen en Out of Africa (1937). Dinesen’s status as a modern woman is achieved by embracing a venerable and very male form of power; it is a vision of an aristocracy exempt from labor and at the heart of a world of tribute, “He is a privileged person, the one who has got nothing to do, but for whose enrichment and pleasure all things are brought together” (Dinesen, 1938: 83).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call