Abstract

Writing effective higher-education institutional histories is never easy. Too often, charting the development of universities in Canada has fallen into, rather than avoided, the pitfalls of mundanity, as if the history is allegorically representing the mortar itself. Chapter by chapter, the rise of the institution is hagiographically documented, through the laying of the cornerstone to the establishment of the mandate, to the appointment of [End Page 165] the administrators, the hiring of the professors, and the enrolment of the first students, then onto the success of these three groups of people over time. The university is on the road inevitably to bigger and better things. Histories are written to explain a current, most often positive, institutional disposition or embodiment and are endemically imbued with an intellectual bias. These parochialisms are difficult to avoid, even in the presence of a strong argumentative thesis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.