Abstract
Objective:To study whether modified transseptal suturing could be an alternative to packing after septoplasty. Method:We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. The study involved 40 patients who underwent septoplasty. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, one with anterior nasal packing and the other with modified transseptal suturing. Patients were asked to record their subjective discomfort levels on a visual analogue scale（VAS） during 48 h postoperatively. Both groups were compared for VAS, postoperative complications 2 weeks after septoplasty through nasal endoscope, the datum of rhinomanometry before surgery and 2 weeks after surgery. Result:The differences of mean postoperative VAS score between two groups were statistically significant（P<0.05）. The patients of nasal packing group experienced more discomforts than the other group. No statistically significant between two groups in terms of the datum of rhinomanometry before surgery and 2 weeks after surgery（P>0.05）. There were no bleeding, septal hematoma, nasal septum perforation and local infection in all patients 2 weeks after septoplasty. During follow-up 1 case was found with postoperative nasal adhesion, nasal vestibular swelling and fester were seen in two patients and nasal peculiar smell was found in 1 case in nasal packing group. We can find that there were a lot of blood crust in silicone ventilation tube about in 14 patients in packing group. However, the suturing group could see none of the above questions. Conclusion:Modified transseptal suturing is more simple and convenient than nasal packing. In a word, the use of modified transseptal suturing could be an alternative topacking after septoplasty.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call