Abstract
The worth of Norbert Elias's theory of a `civilizing process' when applied to the study of changing forms of punishment is being increasingly recognized. His work seems to offer a more credible explanation for changes in punishment than previous theories; structural changes can be linked with shifts in people's sensibilities, answering the crucial question as to why people would opt for a less physically brutal punishment, without falling into `Whiggish' history. However, Elias's theory cannot fully incorporate the ambivalence of modern punishment because it sees the `civilizing process' as being incompatible with `decivilizing' trends. Utilizing his discussion of feudalization, the conditions and features of decivilized punishment are highlighted and modern penal practices are to assess whether they embody a `decivilizing process'.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
