Abstract

Abstract Throughout the history of East Asia, various polities in modern-day Korea, Japan, and Vietnam accepted investitures bestowed by the Chinese royal court. Many of these states also established their own vassal structures based on this tributary system. In light of this, it would be more accurate to describe the traditional international order of East Asia as a system of investitures and tributes, an “investiture-tribute system.” The significance of this system is the royal court being revered by its tributaries, which acknowledge it as the superior power. Looking at the vassal relationship between the Ming [1368-1644] and Qing [1644-1911] courts and the states of Joseon 朝鮮, Ryukyu 琉球, and Vietnam under various names, it is clear that the tributary system was a basic mechanism that facilitated bilateral trade, cultural exchange, border control, and judicial cooperation. Moreover, when vassal states encountered threats to their national security, the Chinese government assisted them with diplomatic and military resources befitting its position as the imperial court. Yet, although the tributary system enabled a relationship in which the royal court enjoyed a position of superiority and its vassal states an inferior one, none of the vassal states formed an alliance that revolved around the Chinese empire. Hence, in the near-modern period, the system struggled to contend with both the great world powers that made use of the treaty system and the expansion of Japan in East Asia.

Highlights

  • Throughout the history of East Asia, various polities in modern-day Korea, Japan, and Vietnam accepted investitures bestowed by the Chinese royal court

  • The tributary system enabled a relationship in which the royal court enjoyed a position of superiority and its vassal states an inferior one, none of the vassal states formed an alliance that revolved around the Chinese empire

  • The term “East Asia” as used in this paper refers to the cultural sphere made up of the various regions that share the Chinese writing system, including China and the numerous vassal states that occupied modern-day Korea, Japan, and Vietnam

Read more

Summary

The Tributary System as a Mechanism for Settling Bilateral Matters

The Qing government stipulated that when foreign tribute missions went to China, relevant documentation first had to be submitted to the viceroy and inspector general [dufu 督撫] at the port of entry for transfer to the court. After the Qing court lifted the ban on maritime trade [haijin 海禁], the Ministry of Rites informed Korea that, “regarding those [Chinese merchants] adrift [in Korea after being shipwrecked], those with intact vessels will be repatriated by sea, while those without vessels will be transported to Fenghuang.” Korea assisted Chinese who had been shipwrecked in Korean waters by helping them to repair vessels that were salvageable and by supporting with food and clothing those who were repatriated For those who could not repair their boats, the government provided funds for purchasing their goods and registered the shipwrecked merchants’ names, ages, place of residence, and cargo. This demonstrates that the tributary system was the basic means by which either side could stay up to date on bilateral affairs but was an important mechanism for settling bilateral matters and cooperating on border affairs

The Tributary System and the National Security of Vassal States
Conclusion
Works Cited
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call