The chief justices' self assignment of majority opinions in salient cases

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

This study examines the extent to which the chief justices on the United States Supreme Court self-assign the majority opinion in salient cases. The period covered is 1801 until the summer of 1989. I discovered that the chief justices as a group self-assigned 35% of the majority opinions in salient cases. Some chief justices, however, self-assigned at a much higher rate than others. The range extends from Marshall (89%) to Fuller (15). Two senior associate justices— Justice Brennan and the first Justice Harlan—were more advantaged in opinion assignments in salient cases than Chief Justices Rehnquist and Fuller. I also discovered that the chief justices were somewhat more likely to self-assign when the final vote was unanimous.