Abstract
This essay argues that Karl Kraus and Myles na gCopaleen deserve to be analysed alongside each other specifically in relation to their critique of the culture industry and the influence of the cliche in the era of mass communications. It is contended that some aspects of Cruiskeen Lawn may be understood in the context of those whom Kraus influenced so much: the Frankfurt School theorists Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin, in particular in Adorno’s essay on the German poet and feuilletonist Heinrich Heine. In conclusion, it is shown how, in cultures which are regulated by the printed word, to take on the misprinted, the cliched, and the incompetent in the domain of language, as Kraus and na gCopaleen do, is a prerequisite activity to attacking the received ideas and mystifications of society at large.* This essay was awarded the International Flann O'Brien Society's prize for 'Best Essay Length Study on a Brian O’Nolan Theme, 2015-16.'To read the article, click Download or View PDF.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Parish Review: Journal of Flann O'Brien Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
