Abstract

Through the inexorable workings of natural selection, wetlands have come to support a group of species that are especially well adapted to the physical and chemical peculiarities of saturated substrates and shallow water. These species give wetlands their distinctive biological signature and sustain the biotic functions of wetlands (Tiner 1998). The species that occupy wetlands show varying degrees of specialization. Some are so highly specialized that they can live or reproduce only in wetlands; these are called obligate wetland species. A second group contains organisms that are adapted for life in wetlands but are not restricted to wetlands; these are called facultative wetland species. Facultative wetland species show every conceivable shade of association with wetlands: they range from almost obligate to barely facultative. The distribution of obligate wetland species coincides closely with the distribution of wetlands. Thus, one could be tempted to rely heavily on obligate wetland species to find and map wetlands. Inference from obligate wetland species, however, must be tempered with caution. First, the absence of obligate wetland species does not necessarily mean absence of wetland, given that a wetland can be mostly or even entirely occupied by facultative wetland species. In addition, the degree to which a given species is a wetland obligate may not be known with absolute certainty. Where a genetic variant or an unusual set of physical conditions prevails, a species that seemed to be obligate in other situations may prove to be merely facultative and thus not diagnostic proof of the presence of wetland. The perils of absolute reliance on obligate wetland species have turned the attention of wetland mappers to the analysis of entire communities. Although community analysis can be done in a number of ways, the central idea is to score a community according to the proportionate representation of species that show a known facultative or obligate affinity with wetland conditions. The analysis of communities for the purpose of mapping and identifying wetlands has been focused almost entirely on vascular plants (grasses, forbs, shrubs, and trees). Two good reasons for this are the relative ease with which plant communities can be analyzed and the immobility of plants.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call