Abstract
* The objective of this paper is to present the case for corporate management of foreign exchange risk. The arguments that oppose hedging at the level of the firm can be summed up as follows: Foreign exchange risk does not exist; even if it exists, it need not be hedged; even if it is to be hedged, corporations need not hedge it. In support of the above reasoning, one or more of the following arguments are advanced. 1. The Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) theorem implies compensating changes in price levels and exchange rates; hence, there is no exchange risk. 2. The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) purportedly suggests that it makes no difference whether exchange risk is managed separately or passed along to the capital market; hence, even if exchange risk exists, it need not be hedged. 3. The Modigliani-Miller (MM) theorem implies
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
