Abstract
BackgroundEntitlement to sickness benefits is a legal process requiring health-related reduced work capacity confirmed by a physician via a sickness certificate. However, there is a knowledge gap concerning physicians’ clinical practice of work capacity assessments for patients with common mental disorders (CMD). Physicians claim more knowledge and skills in how to actually do the assessments. The aim of this study was to explore physicians’ tacit knowledge of performing assessments of capacity to work and the need for sickness absence in patients with depression and anxiety disorders.MethodsWe performed a qualitative study with open-ended interviews and a short video vignette of a physician and a patient with depression as stimuli. Participating physicians (n = 24) were specialized in general practice, occupational health or psychiatry and experienced in treating patients with depression and anxiety. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Inductive content analysis was used as the analytical tool.ResultsFive categories were identified. Category 1 identified work capacity assessment as doing a jigsaw puzzle without any master model. The physicians both identified and created the pieces of the puzzle, mainly by facilitating strategies to make the patient a better supplier of essential information. The finished puzzle made up a highly individualized comprehensive picture required for adequate assessment. Categories 2–4 identified the particular essential pieces of information the participants used, relating to the patient’s disorder, capacity in the work place and contextual everyday life. For the sickness absence assessment, apart from decreased work capacity, the physicians also took particulars of the work place into account; e.g. could the work place handle an employee with reduced capacity.ConclusionsPhysicians’ tacit knowledge of assessing work capacity and the need for sickness absence for patients with CMD was identified as doing a jigsaw puzzle. The physicians became identifiers and creators of the pieces of the puzzle using a broad palette of essential information. Our findings contribute to the knowledge gap on clinical assessment and can be used as an educational tool. Because they are based on the professions’ tacit knowledge, acceptance of the model can be expected to be high.
Highlights
Entitlement to sickness benefits is a legal process requiring health-related reduced work capacity confirmed by a physician via a sickness certificate
Nielsen et al (2011) [8] investigated decision making in the sickness certificate process and found that work capacity was almost never discussed among the physicians; this may be due to physicians’ greater interest in symptoms or lack of training in work capacity assessment
The physicians needed to both identify and create the pieces, mainly from information supplied by the patient
Summary
Entitlement to sickness benefits is a legal process requiring health-related reduced work capacity confirmed by a physician via a sickness certificate. There is a knowledge gap concerning physicians’ clinical practice of work capacity assessments for patients with common mental disorders (CMD). The aim of this study was to explore physicians’ tacit knowledge of performing assessments of capacity to work and the need for sickness absence in patients with depression and anxiety disorders. Nielsen et al (2011) [8] investigated decision making in the sickness certificate process and found that work capacity was almost never discussed among the physicians; this may be due to physicians’ greater interest in symptoms or lack of training in work capacity assessment. Few studies have explored these difficulties and none have reported how physicians do the work capacity assessment in more detail
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.