Abstract

This chapter explores the rise of ethics as the discipline to address issues in robotics and artificial intelligence (AI). But why single out the discipline of “ethics”? I show how ethics is not a homogeneous, or unitary, body of knowledge, and that we have to pay attention to narratives in ethics that reproduce class and sex biases. In this sense, I focus on the theme of corporate and academic interest in the ethics of robots and AI, which, as I argue, is motivated by a metaphysical project to redefine the human as equivalent to a machine (robot) and to algorithmic programs (AI). I argue that the rejection of humans as distinct from machines represents the failure of mainstream philosophy to assimilate perspectives of class and sex into ethics as a body of knowledge that is capable of solving human crises. Rather than see ethics as neutral, I show a connection between corporate interest in ethics of robots and AI on the one hand, and the redefinition of the human on the other. I propose we should question ethical paradigms and ensure that feminist and class analyses are integrated into contemporary narratives of ethics of robots and AI.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.