Abstract

This paper explores the ways physical and health education is justified in two school settings: a private girls' school and a co-educational government school located in the same Australian city. Physical and health education policies and interview material with teachers are drawn on to explore the meanings taken up by the schools. Whilst similar sets of ‘truths’ around young people and health were drawn on to define the place of physical and health education in the lives of their students, there were also stark differences. It is argued that through these differences important discursive work is being performed. In particular, this paper explores how the schools are implicated in the discursive continuation of particular ‘classed’ subjectivities. For example, a set of discourses around ‘at-risk’, ‘disadvantaged’, ‘youth’ were drawn on by the teachers from the government school to construct physical and health education as a means for ‘saving’ their students' lives. By comparison, in the private girls' school's texts, emphasis was on inviting students to become particular ‘independent’, ‘responsible’ young women. It is argued that the exposure and access to these different notions of ‘health’ positioned students quite differently as particular ‘classed’ subjects.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.