The business case for quality.

Abstract

Perspective Health AffairsVol. 20, No. 6: Chronic Care In America PERSPECTIVEThe Business Case For QualityRobert S. GalvinPUBLISHED:November/December 2001No Accesshttps://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.57AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextView PDFPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions View article"The Business Case For Quality." Health Affairs, 20(6), pp. 57–58TOPICSQuality of careHealth care providersQuality improvementPaymentMarketsFee-for-serviceCost reductionCapitationDiagnosis-related groupsPharmaceuticals Loading Comments... Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. DetailsExhibitsReferencesRelated Article MetricsCitations: Crossref 10 History Published online 1 November 2001 InformationCopyright 2001 by Project HOPE - The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.PDF downloadCited ByEconomics and Finance in Medical Quality Management1 September 2020Composite Measures for Rating Hospital Quality with Major Surgery30 March 2012 | Health Services Research, Vol. 47, No. 5Who Pays for Poor Surgical Quality? Building a Business Case for Quality ImprovementJournal of the American College of Surgeons, Vol. 202, No. 6Perspectives on Elevating Quality in EAP Through Standards EnforcementJournal of Workplace Behavioral Health, Vol. 21, No. 1Robert Steven Galvin, MD: A Conversation with the Editor on Health Care Systems in a Post–Managed Care World11 December 2017 | Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, Vol. 18, No. 3Estimating the Return on Investment in Disease Management Programs Using a Pre–Post AnalysisDisease Management, Vol. 7, No. 1Employer-Based Disease Management Programs in CancerDisease Management & Health Outcomes, Vol. 12, No. 1Using Performance Measurement to Drive ImprovementMedical Care, Vol. 41, No. SupplementLarge Employers' New Strategies in Health CareNew England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 347, No. 12Microsystems in Health Care: Part 1. Learning from High-Performing Front-Line Clinical UnitsThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, Vol. 28, No. 9