Abstract

The argument of this book is that social science is dominated by root metaphors and routine methods appropriated from classical mechanics, and that this keeps us from seeing whole man; we see only a broken self-image. The author has certainly identified and attacked a number of outworn, indefensible doctrines: materialist metaphysics, naive behaviorism, the apotheosis of mathematical and statistical methods in social science, the claim that science can be altogether value-free, the bureaucratization of administration, the denial of the limits of scientific method, the naive notion of an observer wholly isolated from the object of his investigation. However, this volume lacks both originality and subtlety. What is true has been said far better many times before. The author apparently does not understand philosophy sufficiently well to do justice to the range of topics he skips across. He does not properly deal with the value problem in modern science. His

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.