The Best Practices in Delay and disruption analysis in Iraq’s construction sector

Abstract

Delay and disturbance analysis (DD) is a significant cause of claims and conflicts in the Iraqi building industry, frequently resulting in time and expense overruns. The extent to which each contracting party is responsible for the postponed job execution and additional expenses incurred is often at the heart of the dispute. Various methodologies have been developed over time to answer this question. This research was undertaken using a mixed-method approach, which involved a detailed examination of the related literature first. Due to programming and record-keeping shortcomings, the primary finding is that DD testing methodologies with major defects in the literature were the most widely found in use. To encourage the use of more efficient methodologies that ensure greater efficiency, a scheme integrating best practice recommendations for promoting better record-keeping and programming practice has been established efficient claims settlement with fewer chances of conflicts.