Abstract

PurposeVendors’ social cues – physical or behavioural hints – have an impact on the professional buyer. However, little is known about that impact. The purpose of this paper is to place knowledge about the impact of social cues that other disciplines acquired in the context of business-to-business (B2B) marketing to contribute constructively to the research agenda.Design/methodology/approachBy integrating findings on the processing of social cues and the behavioural response from the disciplines of neuroscience, biology and psychology (specifically the behavioural inhibition system [BIS]/behavioural activation system [BAS]-theory), this paper aims to provide an interdisciplinary perspective on the automatic evaluation of vendors by professional buyers.FindingsSocial cues are likely to be of substantial value in the (first) encounter between buyer and seller. Positively evaluated social cues create an approach-motivated behavioural intention, whereas negatively evaluated ones create avoidance. This process is probably predominantly mediated by trust and moderated by personality and contextual factors.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper stimulates research about the impact of social cues in a B2B context. While such knowledge would add practical value, this paper also explores possibilities for managers to use neuroscientific techniques to assess and train sales agents.Originality/valueThe impact of social cues is hardly covered in the B2B marketing literature, but they have an important impact on B2B decision-making. The conceptual framework combines the BIS/BAS theory (approach/avoidance) with the SOR-model (stimulus-organism-response), which is unique to the B2B marketing field.

Highlights

  • It appears to be difficult to grasp the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful vendor, especially in a businessto-business (B2B) context (Szymanski and Churchill, 1990; Franke and Park, 2006)

  • SCOPUS identifies no publication on social cues, or on a related topic like body language, within the context of the encounter between the professional buyer and seller within any of the leading three journals in B2B marketing (i.e. IMM, JBIM and JBBM)

  • Why are professional buyers likely to be sensitive to social cues? The process of buying implies having some kind of relationship with another party

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It appears to be difficult to grasp the difference between a successful and an unsuccessful vendor, especially in a businessto-business (B2B) context (Szymanski and Churchill, 1990; Franke and Park, 2006). With the paradigm shift from marketing instruments targeting transactions to relationship marketing (Grönroos, 1994; LaPlaca and da Silva, 2016), the literature on the success of B2B salespeople has focussed on the selling strategy and behaviour of the vendor. The positive relationship between a customeroriented selling strategy and/or adaptive selling behaviour on one side and sales performance on the other still has loose ends (Singh and Koshy, 2011). It might be that salespeople believe there is a positive relationship between their customer-oriented. Received 29 June 2016 Revised 15 October 2016 15 January 2017 4 March 2017 Accepted 5 March 2017

Social cues
The function of social cues
Social cues and perceived relationship value
Eye gaze Gestures Attractiveness
Context factors
Managerial and scientific implications
Discussion and conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.