The Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912Sharon E. KingslandSharon E. Kingsland Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 82, Number 3Sep., 1991 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/355838 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 25Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1991 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Max Meulendijks Eclipsing the Eclipse?: A Neo-Darwinian Historiography Revisited, Journal of the History of Biology 54, no.33 (Sep 2021): 403–443.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-021-09650-9Peter V. Minorsky American racism and the lost legacy of Sir Jagadis Chandra Bose, the father of plant neurobiology, Plant Signaling & Behavior 16, no.11 (Dec 2020): 1818030.https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2020.1818030Anahita Rouyan Scientific Nature Faking: Experimental Life Sciences in American Print Media and Culture, 1900–1914, ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 27, no.11 (Aug 2019): 106–127.https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isz057S. Andrew Inkpen Demarcating Nature, Defining Ecology: Creating a Rationale for the Study of Nature’s “Primitive Conditions”, Perspectives on Science 25, no.33 (May 2017): 355–392.https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00246Kristin Johnson The Natural Historian, (Mar 2016): 84–96.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118620762.ch6 ESA Bibliography, (May 2015): 217–258.https://doi.org/10.1201/b18493-12Frank N. Egerton History of Ecological Sciences, Part 53: Organizing Ecologists before 1946, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 96, no.22 (Apr 2015): 239–311.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-96.2.239Helen Anne Curry Speeding Up Evolution: X-Rays and Plant Breeding in the United States, 1925–1935, (Feb 2015): 459–478.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12185-7_22Arlin Stoltzfus, Kele Cable Mendelian-Mutationism: The Forgotten Evolutionary Synthesis, Journal of the History of Biology 47, no.44 (May 2014): 501–546.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-014-9383-2Frank N. Egerton History of Ecological Sciences, Part 48: Formalizing Plant Ecology, about 1870 to mid-1920s, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 94, no.44 (Oct 2013): 341–378.https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623-94.4.341Jim Endersby Mutant Utopias: Evening Primroses and Imagined Futures in Early Twentieth-Century America Jim Endersby, Isis 104, no.33 (Jul 2015): 471–503.https://doi.org/10.1086/673270Lisa Onaga Toyama Kametaro and Vernon Kellogg: Silkworm Inheritance Experiments in Japan, Siam, and the United States, 1900–1912, Journal of the History of Biology 43, no.22 (Mar 2010): 215–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-010-9222-zJoe Cain Rethinking the Synthesis Period in Evolutionary Studies, Journal of the History of Biology 42, no.44 (Oct 2009): 621–648.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009-9206-zLuis Campos That Was the Synthetic Biology That Was, (Aug 2009): 5–21.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2678-1_2 Marsha L. Richmond The 1909 Darwin Celebration:Reexamining Evolution in the Light of Mendel, Mutation, and Meiosis Richmond, Isis 97, no.33 (Jul 2015): 447–484.https://doi.org/10.1086/508076Marsha L. Richmond “The ‘Domestication’ of Heredity: The Familial Organization of Geneticists at Cambridge University, 1895–1910”, Journal of the History of Biology 39, no.33 (Jul 2006): 565–605.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-004-5431-7Georgina M. Montgomery Place, Practice and Primatology: Clarence Ray Carpenter, Primate Communication and the Development of Field Methodology, 1931–1945, Journal of the History of Biology 38, no.33 (Nov 2005): 495–533.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-005-0553-0Garland E. Allen The Changing Image of Biology in the Twentieth Century, (Jan 2002): 43–83.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0587-6_4Gordon McOuat From Cutting Nature at Its Joints to Measuring It: New Kinds and New Kinds of People in Biology, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32, no.44 (Dec 2001): 613–645.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(01)00027-9Joe Cain Woodger, Positivism, and the Evolutionary Synthesis, Biology & Philosophy 15, no.44 (Sep 2000): 535–551.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006713702749David Magnus Heuristics and Biases in Evolutionary Biology, Biology & Philosophy 12, no.11 (Dec 1996): 21–38.https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017953510082 Bibliography: A Guide to the Life Sciences, Osiris 10, no.11 (Oct 2015): 233–241.https://doi.org/10.1086/368751Paolo Palladino Wizards and Devotees: On the Mendelian Theory of Inheritance and the Professionalization of Agricultural Science in Great Britain and the United States, 1880?1930, History of Science 32, no.44 (Jul 2016): 409–444.https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539403200403Bert Theunissen Knowledge is power: Hugo de Vries on science, heredity and social progress, The British Journal for the History of Science 27, no.33 (Jan 2009): 291–311.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400032192 John Neu Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences, 1991, Isis 82 (Oct 2015): 1–271.https://doi.org/10.1086/356021