Abstract

Academia is prone to incivility and interpersonal conflict like any other workplace environment, although incivility in academia is manifested in behaviors such as undermining colleagues’ professional standing, intelligence and authority; reprobating other’s accomplishments; and hiding knowledge from other faculty members. The autonomy, independence, academic freedom, and tenure in academia lead to a working environment (culture) with different “rules of engagement”, governed by the faculty members themselves. This study examines the impact of employee cynicism on faculty’s interpersonal conflict as a source of stress, which leads to undesirable organizational behaviors, namely higher turnover intention and knowledge hiding behavior; furthermore, the role of faculty’s emotional intelligence as a moderator on the relationship between interpersonal conflict among faculty members and turnover intention has been investigated as a second objective of this study. The study uses a quantitative method of research and analysis, by collecting data from 200 faculty members in private higher education institutions. The study’s hypotheses were tested by Smart PLS3 (SEM) to conclude that: 1) interpersonal conflict directly influences turnover intention and knowledge hiding behavior; 2) employee cynicism has no mediating effect in the relationship between interpersonal conflict, and turnover intention or knowledge hiding behavior; 3) Faculty’s emotional intelligence moderates the relationship between interpersonal conflict and turnover intention.

Highlights

  • Different forms of bullying in higher education have been documented among various ranks of faculty members (Lester, 2013; Reio & Ghosh, 2009)

  • This study examines the impact of employee cynicism on faculty’s interpersonal conflict as a source of stress, which leads to undesirable organizational behaviors, namely higher turnover intention and knowledge hiding behavior; the role of faculty’s emotional intelligence as a moderator on the relationship between interpersonal conflict among faculty members and turnover intention has been investigated as a second objective of this study

  • This study has aimed to discover the role of employee cynicism and emotional intelligence in private higher education institutions in Northern Cyprus

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Different forms of bullying in higher education have been documented among various ranks of faculty members (Lester, 2013; Reio & Ghosh, 2009). The combination of factors presented in today’s academic culture such as academic freedom, tenure distress, and more corporatized form of organizations, would lead to conflict between faculty members (Snyder-Yuly et al, 2020; Keashly & Neuman, 2010; Twale, 2017; Twale & De Luca, 2008). Nelson and Lambert (2001) mention “Academic Freedom” as the spirit of academic life. They continue with the doctrine of “Academic Freedom” which is stated to defend and protect academicians against discrimination with its four pillars, eventually being used to justify other non-academic behaviors such as intimidation, harassment, and other uncivil conducts. And Newman (2010) discuss the “Academic Freedom and Autonomy” in higher education climate, they claim that:

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call