Abstract
A rise in residential solar rooftop PV (SRPV) has been observed in Thailand because of the decreasing costs of solar photovoltaics (PV) and implementation of incentive programs for SRPV. However, without financial assistance, it is not economically feasible to invest in a SRPV system with Stationary Battery Storage (SBS) due to the high up-front cost of SBS and the low power retail price for household. This study examines the benefit to Thai households with SRPV under different technology regimes, incentives, rate structures, and trading mechanisms such as Peer-to-Peer (P2P), and financial aid programs. It is found that the households who install solar with SBS, or a Battery Electric Vehicle see a minor benefit. Net Energy Metering saves more money than Net Billing (NB) under different retail rate structures and price escalation as well as with different load patterns in pre-COVID19 and during COVID19 conditions. In addition, SRPV can deliver even greater financial return if it is supported by measures, such as a lower loan interest rate and a substantial share of the loan amount. Compared to NB, P2P energy trading is favorable for SRPV that purchase and sell excess solar rooftop energy after self-consumed with the neighboring household.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
