Abstract
The worldwide costs of dementia are US$315 billion [1]. Monthly costs of Alzheimer’s disease in Spain are 1,426 per month [2]. What is the purpose, value, and usefulness of such statements? The number of Cost of Illness (CoI) studies is steadily increasing. For almost any high resource-consuming disease, there is some kind of CoI estimate available. There is also a kind of ongoing CoI rally. Like kids in the sandbox, advocates for one disease argue that “my disease is much more expensive than your disease”, implicitly saying that a higher CoI demands more resources (than diseases with lower CoI). Any health economist knows that this way of arguing is a misuse. But, so what; politicians and other decision makers in the allocation of resources are very sensitive to such policy-making statements. In a time when resources for care and research are scarce (which they of course always more or less will be!), perhaps not all, but many tricks seems to be defensible – “the end justifies the means”! Behind any message there is an interest and a more or less hidden messenger – a drug company, a patient advocate organization/non-governmental organization (NGO), a research group looking for funding, etc. Chastened economists also sarcastically say that if all CoI figures for various disorders are summarized, this
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have