The area postrema lesions alter the inhibitory effects of peripherally infused pancreatic polypeptide on pancreatic secretion

Abstract

Circulating PP binds to specific receptors in the DVC through the AP, but the mechanism through which these brain receptors affect pancreatic secretion is not clear. We hypothesize that the removal of the AP (APX) will alter the effects of PP on pancreatic secretion. APX or sham procedures were performed in anesthetized male Wistar rats. After a 1-month recovery, one group of rats were infused with either PP (30 or 100 pmol/kg per h) or vehicle under basal or 2-DG-stimulated (75 mg/kg, i.v. bolus) conditions for studying pancreatic exocrine secretion. A second parallel group was sacrificed for examination of PP receptor binding in the brain stem. A third group received an intraperitoneal injection of PP at the dose of 4.15×10 4 pmol/kg (200 μg/kg) and c-fos expression in the brain stem was examined. APX eliminated PP binding sites in the DVC as assessed by autoradiography. PP infusion caused a dose-dependent decrease in basal protein secretion. APX partially reversed PP inhibition of basal protein secretion when infused at 30 pmol/kg per h, and at 100 pmol/kg per h stimulated pancreatic fluid secretion and reversed the inhibition of protein secretion. During 2-DG stimulation the effects of PP and 2-DG on pancreatic fluid and protein secretion were parallel. PP dose-dependently inhibited 2-DG-stimulated secretion in sham rats. APX reduced the pancreatic fluid (54%) and protein (46%) secretory response to 2-DG. However, PP at 30 pmol/kg per h remained a potent inhibitor of 2-DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion in APX rats. This effect was blunted with PP at 100 pmol/kg per h in APX rats, possibly related to the stimulatory effect of high-dose PP in APX rats without 2-DG. Furthermore, i.p. PP induced significantly greater c-fos activation of NTS neurons in APX rats than sham rats, despite the apparent absence of PP binding sites in the DVC. We conclude that in awake rats, PP inhibits basal secretion, in part, through the AP. Furthermore, and unlike PYY, PP inhibits 2-DG-stimulated pancreatic secretion, and it does so through an AP-independent mechanism. The possibility that the mechanism may involve the DVC cannot be excluded since i.p. injection of PP activates c-fos expression in DVC neurons. Thus, PP and PYY may regulate different components of the pancreatic secretory control system through unique pathways.