Abstract
ABSTRACT Hair pigmentation is a valuable feature in forensic hair analysis and hair comparisons. Microscopic pigmentation features from participants' hair were classified and documented. The discriminating power of template matching, unsupervised and supervised machine learning methods were compared to determine which method best distinguished between participants and accurately assigned hairto an individual, based on pigmentation features. Template matching analysis revealed a higher frequency of inter-person matches compared to intra-person matches, and the unsupervised model’s predicted labels did not align with true labels. These findings suggest the presence of an unknown dimensionality beyond the observable pigmentation features used in forensic hair classification, highlighting the crucial role of forensic expertise. In contrast, supervised machine learning demonstrated superior accuracy and greater interpretability due to its training on labelled data, making it more appropriate for forensic applications. This research underscores the continued importance of human expertise, particularly in the initial classification of training data for supervised machine learning. The potential applications of supervised machine learning in forensic science include training, competency testing and rapid intelligence as a novel and innovative tool while advancing the field towards more objective methodologies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.