Abstract

The results of a simulated Thellier palaeointensity experiment show that the low temperature portion of Arai plots produced by samples with pseudo-single-domain (PSD)-like hysteresis properties can produce significant inaccuracies despite passing conventional acceptance criteria. Furthermore, full Arai plots which fail these criteria can still produce reasonably accurate results. The evidence presented suggests that during a palaeointensity experiment: pTRM checks can fail despite no alteration occurring, pTRM tail checks are not reliable as indicators of MD-like behaviour, room temperature susceptibility monitoring is unreliable for detecting alteration, and that the minimum requirement for the f (fraction)-value should be increased from 0.15 to at least 0.5.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.