Abstract

Abstract We analyse the results of Thellier palaeointensity experiments modified so that the measured magnetisation at any stage may be decomposed into components of natural remanent magnetisation (NRM) and laboratory thermal remanent magnetisation (TRM). We demonstrate that the very long high temperature tails of pTRM acquired by multidomain (MD) grains may be detected in Thellier experiments without recourse to explicit pTRM tail check measurements. This can save time in the experimental process and provides a more sensitive indication of how MD behaviour may affect that particular experiment than either pTRM tail checks or the observation of zigzagging in an IZZI experiment. We observe that the action of imparting a pTRM tail also involves some removal of NRM. However, the pTRM tails are not the analogues of classical overprints as may be intuitively expected but instead appear to favour remagnetisation over demagnetisation. This and other observed behaviour is not consistent with any phenomenological model of MD TRM but is consistent with predictions made by kinematic theory.

Highlights

  • Single domain grains do not uniquely carry the permanent magnetisation of the overwhelming majority of igneous rocks

  • For the other samples which are easier todemagnetise, the design of the experiment produces well-spaced Arai plots so that the palaeointensity is not significantly overestimated. This phenomenon is discussed at length in Biggin et al (2007a) and is relevant here only to the extent that we examine the role of pTRM tails in producing it

  • This is the mean ratio of thermal remanent magnetisation (TRM) gained to natural remanent magnetisation (NRM) lost calculated from the difference between the measurements made after the pTRM tail check and the demagnetisation step

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Single domain grains do not uniquely carry the permanent magnetisation of the overwhelming majority of igneous rocks. Values of both the TRM and NRM components were calculated from measurements of the remanence after every treatment in the experiment (Fig. 2).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call