Abstract

The use of the allometric model $$y = \beta x ^{\alpha }$$ to describe the relative growth of morphological traits of trees is a source of contention in ecology. This is particularly so in a specific form, the West, Brown and Enquist model, which predicts values of $$\alpha $$ that are multiples of 1/4 for various allometric relationships—the quarter-power scaling law. We use statistical techniques to test the appropriateness of the quarter-power scaling allometric model in a number of different relative growth relationships of trees. Two separate datasets are used, one of repeated measures of Abies grandis (Grand fir) trees, another of independent measures of Eucalyptus trees. Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling is used to fit allometric models to the datasets. Generalised additive models, equivalence testing and traditional significance testing are used to assess the adequacy of the allometric models fitted and the values of the estimated exponents relative to those predicted by the WBE model. In only one of the five models fitted was there empirical evidence for the WBE-predicted quarter-power exponent. However, the adequacy of the allometric models was generally supported, though a need for further analysis over a larger range of tree ages/sizes is indicated. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.