Abstract
Inadequate alveolar process width and height can be overcome by the utilization of distraction osteogenesis, split crest technique or a sinus lift, however many clinical scenarios require the use of guided bone regeneration (GBR). When vertical deciencies are present, the collective opinion is that non-resorbable membranes should be employed in the augmentation procedure. While remaining form stable throughout the healing period is advantageous for vertical regeneration, the non-resorbable membranes' biological properties do not aid the primary intention closure over the grafted region in any way. As a result, membrane exposures occur which have emphatically negative effect on the regeneration process. There certainly is an abundance of evidence on the detrimental effect of healing complications on the GBR process, however the information regarding the outcome of the bone regeneration process involving exposed vs unexposed sites in the same individual is scarce.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.