Abstract
At the end of the iconoclastic era, we find two distinct approaches to rhetorical argumentation in the commentarieson Hermogenes’ On Staseis. They indicate a high level of learning and suggest there was no radical break in the continuity ofrhetorical education. However, rhetorical argumentation itself came to be viewed with suspicion during the Byzantine “DarkAge” and may have been subsumed into the study of dialectic. It re-emerged after the second phase of iconoclasm; at the sametime, rhetoric changed its self-definition and began to identify with the practice of philosophy.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have