The 1955 Normative Study of the Tests of General Educational Development

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe 1955 Normative Study of the Tests of General Educational DevelopmentB. S. BloomB. S. Bloom Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 64, Number 3Mar., 1956 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/442296 Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 12Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in The School Review (1893-1979), which is continued by the American Journal of Education (1979-present). Copyright 1956 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ethan L. Hutt The GED and the Rise of Contextless Accountability, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education 116, no.99 (Sep 2014): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600906Kent Hecker, Claudio Violato Validity, Reliability, and Defensibility of Assessments in Veterinary Education, Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 36, no.33 (Sep 2009): 271–275.https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.36.3.271Rajindar K. Koshal, Manjulika Koshal Do Liberal Arts Colleges Exhibit Economies of Scale and Scope?, Education Economics 8, no.33 (Jul 2010): 209–220.https://doi.org/10.1080/096452900750046715Rajindar K. Koshal, Manjulika Koshal Quality and economies of scale in higher education, Applied Economics 27, no.88 (May 2006): 773–778.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036849500000068Maribeth Gettinger Individual differences in time needed for learning: A review of literature, Educational Psychologist 19, no.11 (Oct 2009): 15–29.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528409529278Gary E. Dunkleberger, Henry W. Heikkinen Mastery learning: Implications and practices, Science Education 67, no.55 (Oct 1983): 553–560.https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670503Jeffrey L. Derevensky, Sybil Hart, Mona Farrell An examination of achievement-related behavior of high- and low-achieving inner-city pupils, Psychology in the Schools 20, no.33 (Jul 1983): 328–336.https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198307)20:3<328::AID-PITS2310200313>3.0.CO;2-DDavid R. Witmer Cost Studies in Higher Education, Review of Educational Research 42, no.11 (Jun 2016): 99–127.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543042001099B. CLAUDE MATHIS, JOHN W. COTTON, LEE SECHREST THE ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT, (Jan 1970): 601–657.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-480150-9.50018-1Robert L. Ebel, Robert E. Hill Chapter IV: Development and Applications of Tests of Educational Achievement, Review of Educational Research 29, no.11 (Jun 2016): 42–56.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543029001042 Benjamin S. Bloom , and Charles R. Statler Changes in the States on the Tests of General Educational Development from 1943 to 1955, The School Review 65, no.22 (Oct 2015): 204–221.https://doi.org/10.1086/442390Ralph C Preston, Estoy T Reddin Chapter II: Status of the Curriculum, Review of Educational Research 27, no.33 (Jun 2016): 250–261.https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543027003250