Abstract
AbstractThe very useful singlet‐oxygen ene reaction of reluctant alkenes, e.g. 1, 5, 7, 8, and, in particular, the mono(allyl hydroperoxides) 10 and 11, is handicapped by the instability of the sensitiser TPP. A comparative study of TPP, TPFPP, and TDCPP in the singlet‐oxygen ene reaction of these alkenes shows that 1) the persistence increases in the order TPP < TPFPP < TDCPP, rendering TDCPP the sensitiser of choice for the generation of singlet‐oxygen in non‐polar solvents, 2) the persistence of the tetraarylporphyrins decreases in the presence of an alkene, 3) this decrease strongly depends on the nature of the alkene, being most pronounced in the case of cyclohexene. These results are interpreted in terms of unknown substrate‐derived species which induce oxidative destruction of the tetraarylporphyrins. Alternatively, abstraction of allylic hydrogen atoms from the alkenes by the excited sensitisers may give rise to the observed substrate‐dependent photobleaching. – Because the singlet‐oxygen ene reaction is the key step of a 1,2‐carbonyl transposition with concomitant dehydrogenation, the scope and usefulness of this sequence are distinctly improved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.