Abstract
Although testosterone therapy (TTh) is the standard practice in otherwise healthy hypogonadal men, this therapy has historically been contraindicated in men with a history of prostate cancer. Recent evidence suggests that there is minimal or no prostate cancer growth in the setting of TTh administration in men definitively treated for non-metastatic prostate cancer. To review the evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of TTh in patients previously treated for localized prostate cancer. A literature review of the PubMed database was performed to identify studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of TTh in patients with a history of prostate cancer. Search terms included Testosterone Therapy, Testosterone Replacement Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy, Radiotherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, EBRT, Brachytherapy; Prostate Cancer and Hypogonadism, Low Testosterone; Bipolar Androgen Therapy. Available literature provides evidence for the safe application of TTh in patients previously treated for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. Furthermore, there exists evidence that severely hypogonadal levels of testosterone may lead to worse oncological outcomes. More recent research has begun to elucidate the effectiveness of bipolar androgen deprivation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. This mechanism of action increases the level of evidence indicating that the traditional management of maintaining testosterone levels at low levels may no longer be standard of care. TTh likely has a role in improved erectile function and other quality-of-life concerns in patients developing testosterone deficiency after being treated for prostate cancer. TTh should be offered to select hypogonadal patients who have a history of definitively treated prostate cancer. Adequately designed randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of TTh in this population. Natale C, Carlos C, Hong J, etal. Testosterone Replacement Therapy After Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Review of Literature. Sex Med Rev 2021;9:393-405.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have