Abstract

It is generally accepted that in mature shales, biomarkers and pyrolysis proxies are not very helpful in understanding the source/type of organic matter (OM), paleo-redox conditions during deposition and thermal maturity. The purpose of the study study was conducted to test the efficacy of these proxies in mature Marcellus shale (VRo> 1). Samples were collected from oil-prone (WV-7) and gas-prone (WV-6) wells in Wetzel and Monongalia Counties, West Virginia, respectively. These wells were chosen for this test study because high-resolution geochemical and isotopic studies have previously been conducted on these cores and depositional model had been proposed. The model suggests that sediments in WV-6 well are more mature, received higher terrestrial OM influx and were deposited in less anoxic environment as compared to WV-7 well. We used an improved method to extract the small amount of biomarkers preserved in the samples. Further, the extracts were analyzed by a high-resolution GC×GC FID method to quantify the distribution of aliphatic biomarkers. The hydrogen and oxygen indices (HI vs. OI plot) determined by Source Rock Analysis could not be used to determine the kerogen type due to their very low values. However, interpretations were derived from S1 vs. S2 and S2/S3 vs. TOC cross plots, thermal maturity parameter (Tmax), fraction conversion of OM to hydrocarbon (HC), and residual carbon/pyrolysable carbon (RC/PC) ratio. The conclusions drawn from the biomarkers and SRA data are in agreement with the HC production data from these wells as well as interpretations derived from geochemical and isotopic studies conducted on these core. Therefore, we propose that despite some limitations biomarker and pyrolysis proxies can be used to determine the thermal and depositional history of mature shales like the Marcellus Shale.

Highlights

  • The Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale is rapidly evolving as a major shale gas play in Northern America with an approximate aerial extent of 34,000,000 acres (Engelder and Lash, 2008), and ∼15,000 MCF/day of estimated gas production (EIA, 2016)

  • Source rock analysis (SRA) and aliphatic biomarker analysis were conducted on mature Marcellus Shale samples

  • Source rock analysis (SRA) indicates that sediments in WV-7 core had comparatively higher amounts of free HC (S1), and HC released from cracking of kerogen (S2) than the samples from the WV-6 core

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Middle Devonian Marcellus Shale is rapidly evolving as a major shale gas play in Northern America with an approximate aerial extent of 34,000,000 acres (Engelder and Lash, 2008), and ∼15,000 MCF/day of estimated gas production (EIA, 2016). To precisely evaluate hydrocarbon potential and to delineate or target sweet spots for production, there is a need to better understand these spatiotemporal variations (Boyer et al, 2006) These shales could form in a wide range of sedimentary environments including lacustrine fresh/saline water, terrestrial swamps, marine evaporitic, or deltaic environments (Tourtelot, 1979; Littke, 2006). The organic geochemical analysis can help infer the quantities of expected oil and gas production in a basin and its relation to OM source/type and thermal maturity (Hunt, 1979, 1996; Jarvie et al, 2007; Horsfield and Schulz, 2012; Romero and Philp, 2012). The role of organic geochemistry in the petroleum industry remains underestimated for mature shales

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.