Testing the Implementation of Function-focused Care in Assisted Living Settings

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Function-Focused Care for Assisted Living Using the Evidence Integration Triangle (FFC-AL-EIT) intervention. FFC-AL-EIT was a randomized controlled pragmatic trial including 85 sites and 794 residents. FFC-AL-EIT was implemented by a Research Nurse Facilitator working with a facility champion and stakeholder team for 12months to increase function and physical activity among residents. FFC-AL-EIT included (Step I) Environment and Policy Assessments; (Step II) Education; (Step III) Establishing Resident Function-Focused Care Service Plans; and (Step IV) Mentoring and Motivating. The age of participants was 89.48years [standard deviation (SD)= 7.43], and the majority were female (n= 561; 71%) and white (n= 771; 97%). Resident measures, obtained at baseline, 4, and 12months, included function, physical activity, and performance of function-focused care. Setting outcomes, obtained at baseline and 12months, included environment and policy assessments and service plans. Reach was based on 85 of 90 sites that volunteered (94%) participating. Effectiveness was based on less decline in function (P<.001), more function-focused care (P= .012) and better environment (P= .032) and policy (P= .003) support for function-focused care in treatment sites. Adoption was supported with 10.00 (SD= 2.00) monthly meetings held, 77% of settings engaged in study activities as or more than expected, and direct care workers providing function-focused care (63% to 68% at 4months and 90% at 12months). The intervention was implemented as intended, and education was received based on a mean knowledge test score of 88% correct. Evidence of maintenance from 12 to 18months was noted in treatment site environments (P= .35) and policies continuing to support function-focused care (P= .28)]. The Evidence Integration Triangle is an effective implementation approach for assisted living. Future work should continue to consider innovative approaches for measuring RE-AIM outcomes.