Abstract
Geometric constraints for the perception of three-dimensional (3D) binocular motion are discussed in a probabilistic framework. Two alternative Bayesian models of binocular integration are put forward to explain perceptual bias under uncertainty. The models exploit biologically plausible constraints of local motion and disparity processing in a binocular viewing geometry. Results from computer simulations and model selection support the idea that disparity processing rather than motion processing introduces perceptual bias in 3D motion. This suggests that the binocular motion system combines motion and disparity constraints relatively late when establishing a 3D motion percept.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
