Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) technology is widely used for geodetic monitoring purposes. However, in cases where a higher risk of receiver damage is expected, geodetic GNSS receivers may be considered too expensive to be used. As an alternative, low-cost GNSS receivers that are cheap, light, and prove to be of adequate quality over short baselines, are considered. The main goal of this research is to evaluate the positional precision of a multi-frequency low-cost instrument, namely, ZED-F9P with u-blox ANN-MB-00 antenna, and to investigate its potential for displacement detection. We determined the positional precision within static survey, and the displacement detection within dynamic survey. In both cases, two baselines were set, with the same rover point equipped with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The base point of the first baseline was observed with a geodetic GNSS instrument, whereas the second baseline was observed with a low-cost GNSS instrument. The results from static survey for both baselines showed comparable results for horizontal components; the precision was on a level of 2 mm or better. For the height component, the results show a better performance of low-cost instruments. This may be a consequence of unknown antenna calibration parameters for low-cost GNSS antenna, while statistically significant coordinates of rover points were obtained from both baselines. The difference was again more significant in the height component. For the displacement detection, a device was used that imposes controlled movements with sub-millimeter accuracy. Results, obtained on a basis of 30-min sessions, show that low-cost GNSS instruments can detect displacements from 10 mm upwards with a high level of reliability. On the other hand, low-cost instruments performed slightly worse as far as accuracy is concerned.

Highlights

  • The natural as well as built environment is continuously subjected to various forces in nature that may cause alterations in the shape and size of the environment

  • The base point of the first baseline was observed with a geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) instrument, whereas the second baseline was observed with a low-cost GNSS instrument

  • The first part shows the assessment of the positional quality of low-cost GNSS receivers, whereas the second part represents displacement detection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The natural as well as built environment is continuously subjected to various forces in nature that may cause alterations in the shape and size of the environment. In some cases, those deformations may lead to damage and safety-of-life hazards. In order to prevent the worst-case scenario, manmade structures and natural hazards are monitored with geodetic sensors and methods on a basis of repeated geodetic surveys [1,2]. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS); the latter has been recognized as a methodology for deformation monitoring [3,4,5].

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.