Testicular Pain – Not Always What it Seems: A Cross-Sectional Assessment of Patients Presenting for Chronic Scrotal Content Pain at a Tertiary Care Center

Abstract

ObjectiveTo review historical and examination findings in patients presenting to a tertiary care center for evaluation of Chronic Scrotal Content Pain (CSCP) defined by persistent/bothersome pain present for > 3-months. MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of all patients presenting to our medical center for evaluation of CSCP. Pertinent information collected included historical data, physical examination findings, laboratory and imaging results, and treatments recommended by the assessing physician. The data was summarized to present a cross-sectional representation of patients presenting for CSCP. Results110 patients were identified. 80 patients (73%) had seen at least one prior urologist. 26 patients (24%) had undergone a prior unsuccessful surgical intervention for CSCP. Reproducible tenderness was present in 67% of patients including testicular tenderness in 50 (45%), epididymal tenderness in 60 (55%), and spermatic cord tenderness in 31 patients (28%). 33% of patients did not have any reproductible scrotal content tenderness on physical examination. Surgery was recommended in 57/110 patients (52%), including microdenervation in 22%. Musculoskeletal etiologies were suspected based on specific aspects of the history and physical examination in 43 patients (39%), prompting additional evaluation and/or referrals. ConclusionCSCP presents with a wide array of symptoms and many patients do not have reproducible findings on examination, suggesting alternative sources of pain such as referred pain from musculoskeletal causes. The history and physical examination should include assessments for concurrent abdominal, back, hip, and other genital/pelvic pain that may suggest alternative diagnoses and referrals for appropriate treatment.