Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess and contrast attitudes and confidence regarding erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment among urologists (GU) and primary care providers (PCPs), identifying areas for collaboration, practice improvement, and additional training to enhance men's healthcare (MH) quality and access. MethodsAn anonymous survey with 25 questions on ED treatment, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, was conducted among our institution's providers in GU, internal medicine (IM), and family medicine (FM). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test. Results138 providers responded, including 58 IM, 47 FM, and 33 GU. FM and IM responses generally overlapped with some differences. IM were more positive regarding vacuum erection device (VED) and inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) satisfaction and risk.Comparing GU to FM + IM, GU displayed greater confidence and knowledge about ED. Notably, 63% of GU used the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) compared to 3% of FM + IM. Additionally, 100% of GU strongly/agreed that good options remained after pills failed vs 83% of FM + IM.Significant differences in GU vs FM + IM perspectives on IPP included patient willingness to undergo surgery for ED (67% vs. 12%), patient satisfaction (91% vs. 28%), partner satisfaction (79% vs. 26%) and willingness to recommend/repeat surgery (82% vs. 17%). Notably, 82% of GU vs 10% of FM + IM were aware that Medicare covered implants. ConclusionThis survey reveals significant knowledge gaps in ED treatment between GU and PCPs. Targeted provider education, particularly about penile prostheses, could optimize patient care.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.