Abstract

We define the strength of a test for transition faults based on the number of fault effects that can disappear without causing the test to lose the detection of target faults. The removal of fault effects represents the uncertainty created by pattern-dependent effects that can slow-down or speed-up signal-transitions, thus causing fault effects predicted by logic-level simulation to disappear. A test set that consists of higher-strength tests is less susceptible to these effects. We demonstrate that a transition fault test set with higher-strength tests also detects more path delay faults, which represent delay defects that were not targeted during test generation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.