Abstract

The paper reviews the electrical and optical mechanisms at work in sulfide-based thin-film electroluminescence display devices within the framework of general semiconductor physics. The electrical problem is twofold: (i) charge carriers are sourced at high electric field in a nominally insulating material, the carrier density increasing by almost eight orders of magnitude; (ii) the carriers are transported at high field, with an average energy largely exceeding the thermal one. (i) Carrier sourcing is best understood from direct-current-driven ZnS films, and is ascribed to partly filled deep donors transferring electrons to the conduction band by Fowler–Nordheim tunneling. The deep donors also act as carrier sinkers, and evidence for space charge is afforded by small-signal impedance analysis disclosing a markedly inductive behavior. The conduction picture obtained from dc-driven films is then used to clarify the operation of alternating-current electroluminescence structures where the sulfide is sandwiched between two blocking oxide layers. The electrostatics of the ac structure is investigated in detail including space charge and field nonuniformity, and external observables are related to internal quantities. The simple model of interfacial carrier sourcing and sinking is examined. (ii) High-field electronic transport is controlled by the electron-phonon interaction, and the modeling resorts to numerical simulations or the lucky-drift concept. At low electron energies the interaction with phonons is predominantly polar, while at optical energies it proceeds via deformation potential scattering. In spite of the uncertainties in transport models in that range, it is likely that ∼50% of the electrons overtake 2 eV at the usual operating fields in ZnS. Light emission is associated with impurity luminescence centers embedded in the sulfide host. They are excited while current is flowing, and the ensuing relaxation is partly radiative. We describe the two ways in which an impurity may be excited electrically, namely, impact excitation (internal promotion of the center to a state of higher energy) or impact ionization (with an electron released to the host conduction band). The actual excitation mechanism depends on the position of the impurity excited level relative to the host energy bands. A calculation of the excitation yield (number of excited centers per transferred electron) is detailed in the case of impact excitation. Lastly, a phenomenological description of the various relaxation channels is given in terms of formal kinetics, and the relative importance of radiative relaxation is assessed by means of the deexcitation yield (fraction of centers decaying radiatively), which is defined in the case of the impulse response.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call