Abstract

We have a strong interest in the interplay between geometrical frustrations and quantum fluctuations in the strongly correlated matter because it causes the emergence of new exotic quantum phases. For example, in the past decade, we have found a number of new Mott insulator materials on a triangular layer: Cs2CuCl4 [1] and organic charge transfer salts [2], such as Îș-(BEDT-TTF)2 X and ÎČ-Z[Pd(dmit)2]2. There are geometrical frustrations and quantum fluctuations in these materials. Probably, the interplay has an important role for the disordered behaviors at very low temperatures in some materials. In order to study the low temperature property of strongly correlated matter in low-dimensional systems, we need a theoretical tool beyond the mean-field theory. The numerical approach is a candidate. Unfortunately, there are serious drawbacks in the conventional numerical methods. For example, quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods are powerful tools because they are unbiased. However, the weight of QMC samples can be negative in quantum frustrated magnets, leading to a cancellation in sign, and the accuracy of simulations fatally decreases (this is the so-called negative sign problem.) Exact diagonalization gives us the detail of a ground state, but it can only be applied to small systems. On the other hand, the variational method is flexible, and it is powerful if we choose the appropriate variational wave function. In the past decade, based on the study of entanglement, we discussed the new types of wave functions for quantum many-body systems. We define the probability amplitudes of these wave functions by the tensor contractions of small tensors. Since the tensor contractions can be drawn as a network, it is called a tensor network state. In this paper, we will report the performance of tensor network state for the variational study of quantum frustrated magnets. There are two major tensor network states: projected entangled pair state(PEPS) [3] and multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz(MERA) [4]. In the following, we will focus on the MERA, and we will report the performance for S = 1/2 spatially anisotropic triangular antiferromagnets [5]. We organize this paper as follows: In Sec. 2, we will briefly introduce the tensor network. In addition, we will explain a MERA tensor network for triangular lattice models in detail. In Sec. 3, we will show the performance of MERA for the S = 1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model on a

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call