Telescoping screw fixation compared to traditional in situ screw fixation for slipped capital femoral epiphysis: clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes.

Abstract

This study compares clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes among telescoping and traditional screws for the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). We hypothesized that telescoping screws would prevent slip progression and result in preserved femoral neck growth and improved patient-reported outcomes. Traditional screws were compared to telescoping screws in a 2:1 matched cohort based on age at initial surgery, length of radiographic follow-up and whether or not the hip was pinned prophylactically or as a treatment for SCFE. Neck length and telescoping screw length were measured. The patient-reported outcomes were obtained at routine clinic visits. Total 42 hips were included with a mean follow-up of 24.5 ± 3.3 months. No patients developed avascular necrosis, chondrolysis or needed revision surgical procedures. Telescoping screws increased in length for the entire cohort by a mean of 6.0 ± 4.3 mm. Neck length change was not different in SCFE hips when treated with traditional screws vs. telescoping screws (P = 0.527). However, there was a difference in neck length change between the two groups when comparing prophylactically treated hips (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in patient-reported outcomes among hips treated with telescoping screws compared to traditional screws. Traditional and telescoping screws are both effective for the treatment of SCFE. Telescoping screws have an advantage when prophylactically treating hips that are at risk of slipping as they don't lead to the coxa breva that is seen with traditional screws. However, both treatment methods had similar patient-reported outcomes.