Abstract
Closed reduction is not indicated for stable SCFE, where continuity between the epiphysis and metaphysis has not been disrupted. Treatment method(s) is (are) chosen from in-situ fixation, osteotomy and femoroacetabular impingement treatment. A single screw fixation is often used to fix the epiphysis and the dynamic method is considered especially for young patients. Traditional three-dimensional trochanteric osteotomies have been associated with procedural complexity and uncertainty. A simpler osteotomy method using an updated imaging analysis technology should be considered. Modified-Dunn procedure is indicated for a severe stable SCFE. However, caution is required because recent studies have reported a high rate of complications including postoperative femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) and hip instability when this method is indicated for stable SCFE. Treatment of unstable SCFE is difficult and complication rate is high. Most of unstable SCFE patients were previously treated with closed method and it was difficult to predict an occurrence of postoperative AVN. However, treatment of unstable SCFE has gradually changed in recent years and many studies have shown that physeal hemodynamics can be assessed during treatment. Preoperative assessments include contrast-enhanced MRI and bone scintigraphy. Intraoperative assessments include confirmation of bleeding after drilling the femoral head and monitoring the intracranial pressure by laser doppler flowmetry. It is expected that postoperative AVN can be prevented in many cases by performing the treatment while assessing the intraoperative physeal hemodynamics. Open surgeries have begun to be indicated in the treatment of unstable SCFE through either of anterior approach or (modified) Dunn procedure. The authors expect that recent improvements in assessment of physeal hemodynamics and open treatment method provide improved clinical outcomes in the treatment of SCFE.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.