Abstract
‘Urf in ushul fiqh is categorized as a source of Islamic law or a valid (disputed) Islamic legal proposition, but in the various products of Islamic jurisprudence that exist, it turns out that all schools use ‘urf as a source of law. The categorization seems to contradict the facts of the existing fiqh. Based on this, the focus of the study of this article is to unravel the ulama’ debate about the status of ‘urf in legal terms in each school. By using the library data analyzed in content (content analysis) in depth, it can be concluded that all schools use ‘Urf as a legal proposition or legal source even though the ushul fiqh is classified as a valid (disputed) legal proposition.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.