Abstract
This paper investigates biomethane and BioSNG production processes against the background of the 2018 renewable fuel directive of the European Union (EU). The investigated biomethane processes use manure, clover grass, and grass silage as feedstock, are based on membrane separation gas upgrading processes, and generate 1.0 and 4.8 MW of biomethane. The investigated BioSNG processes use wood chips as feedstock, are based on the dual fluidized bed steam gasification technology and the VESTA SNG process from Amec Foster Wheeler, and generate 6.1, 12.2, and 49.1 MW BioSNG. The techno-economic assessment shows that the biomethane processes have, in general, a lower break-even price for the generated natural gas substitute. However, their scalability is limited and at larger scale (49.1 MW BioSNG capacity), the BioSNG processes become competitive. The 1.0 MW biomethane and all BioSNG plants meet the 2018 renewable fuel directive of the EU. In contrast, the 4.8 MW biomethane process does not meet the directive as the feedstock, which is mainly based on energy crops, causes significant CH4 and CO2 emissions.
Highlights
A reduction of CO2 emissions is necessary to meet the targets of the Paris agreement
Since a direct utilization of biomass is always challenging in terms of purity and solids handling, it is a promising option to convert biomass in a first step into an intermediate feedstock like already applied fossil fuels, e.g., bio-oil, biomethane, or natural gas substitute from biomass steam gasification (BioSNG)
The results show that the natural gas substitute selling price of the BioSNG process is significantly lower at larger plant capacities of up to 50 MW natural gas substitute output
Summary
A reduction of CO2 emissions is necessary to meet the targets of the Paris agreement Those targets should be mainly achieved by investing in wind and solar power, measures to increase the energy efficiency, reforestation, and reduction of deforestation [1]. Biomass-based feedstock come with a significant price increase as suitable technologies are not yet mature, capacities are small, and fossil energy, electricity, natural gas, and oil are available at low price levels today. These aspects lead to a difficult economic situation for the implementation and commercialization of biomass-based concepts
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have