Abstract
AbstractA comparison is made between geometry optimization in Cartesian coordinates, using an appropriate initial Hessian, and natural internal coordinates. Results on 33 different molecules covering a wide range of symmetries and structural types demonstrate that both coordinate systems are of comparable efficiency. There is a marked tendency for natural internals to converge to global minima whereas Cartesian optimizations converge to the local minimum closest to the starting geometry. Because they can now be generated automatically from input Cartesians, natural internals are to be preferred over Z‐matrix coordinates. General optimization strategies using internal coordinates and/or Cartesians are discussed for both unconstrained and constrained optimization. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call