Abstract
To assess practice patterns and opinions of glaucoma specialists regarding indications, surgical technique, and postoperative management for nonvalved aqueous shunts. Anonymous online survey study. American Glaucoma Society (AGS) members. An anonymous online survey was distributed to glaucoma specialists via the AGS forum from June to August2022. Survey questions and responses were assessed in 4 sections: (1) general demographicsand practice patterns; (2) nonvalved tubes vs. trabeculectomy; (3) nonvalved tubes vs. valved tubes; and (4) nonvalved tube techniques. There were 132 respondents; nonvalved tubes were reported to be performed more often than trabeculectomy by 61% of respondents within 5 years of completing training and 23% of respondents with more than 15 years since completing training. The most frequently preferred types of nonvalved tubes were Baerveldt-350 (41%), Baerveldt-250 (27%), and ClearPath-250 (18%). In patients with lower target intraocular pressure (IOP), 92% of respondents preferred trabeculectomy over nonvalved tube; 33% cited a cutoff of < 12 mmHg, and 31% cited a cutoff of < 15 mmHg. In patients with higher preoperative IOP, 50% of respondents preferred valved over nonvalved tubes; 29% cited a cutoff of > 40 mmHg, and 38% cited a cutoff of > 30 mmHg. The most frequently used ligature was 7-0 Vicryl (69%). The most frequently used strategies for early IOP lowering were fenestrations without wicks (70%) and with wicks (22%), with one 10-0 Nylon being the most used wick technique (22%). Overall, 37% of respondents use a ripcord; among ripcord users, 55% use it for hypotony prevention (3-0Prolene most common for this purpose at 35%), and 40% use it for optional early IOP lowering (4-0 Nylon most common for this purpose at 21%). If IOP is too high at postoperative week 4, 38% of respondents do not open the tube early. We demonstrate significant heterogeneity regarding specific indications, surgical technique, and postoperative management for nonvalved tubes. Future work is needed to identify and develop standardized guidelines alongside best practices. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.